You are here: Home // PRINCE2 // PRINCE2 History

PRINCE2 History

It’s true to say the public sector has hardly covered itself in glory with their ability to deliver projects on time, within budget and scope and to the right quality. PROMPTII, PRINCE and PRINCE2 were all introduced to address the common causes of project failure.


Project Resource Organisation Management and Planning Techniques

A project management method developed by Simpact Systems Ltd., PROMPTII was a response to an outcry that computer projects were overrunning on time estimated for completion and original budgets as set out in feasibility studies. It was not unusual to experience factors of double, treble or even ten-times the original estimates. PROMPTII was an attempt to set down guidelines for the stage flow of a computer project as follows:

  • Feasibility Study: to decide whether the project should and can be done and whether it will work if it is done.
  • Initial Stage: where the project organisation is setup.
  • Specification Stage: the development of the user specification.
  • Design Stage: where the logical and from this the physical design of the computer system is developed.
  • Development Stage: when the system is built and tested.
  • Installation Stage: where the user accepts a working system.
  • Operation Stage: when the system is tuned for the work in hand.

In 1979 the UK Government’s Central Computing and Telecommunications Agency (CCTA) adopted the method for all information systems projects. This led to PRINCE’s development ten years later.

1989: PRINCE

Projects IN Controlled Environments

Published by the UK Government agency CCTA, Projects in Controlled Environments (PRINCE) became the UK standard for all government information systems projects.

The main features are:

  • A defined management structure.
  • A system of plans for resourcing and technical issues.
  • A set of control procedures.
  • A focus on products; deliverables to the customer and project deliverables used for managing the project.

A feature in the original method, not seen in other methods, was the idea of “assuring progress” from three separate but linked perspectives:

  • Business Assurance Co-ordinator (BAC): whose role is to oversee the project is in line with the business mission of the company, and to report at progress meetings. This assures the project stays in the best interests of the company.
  • Technical Assurance Co-ordinator (TAC): who oversees the technical aspects of the project and assures it does not get into technical difficulties.
  • User Assurance Co-ordinator (UAC): who represents the eventual user.

However, the PRINCE method developed a reputation as being too unwieldy, too rigid and applicable only to large projects, leading to a revision in 1996.

1996 PRINCE2

Projects IN Controlled Environments 2

An upgrade to PRINCE was considered to be in order and the development was contracted out, but assured by a virtual committee spread among 150 European organisations. The BAC, TAC and UAC were removed in the official version. Most companies who adopt a PRINCE approach to project management adapt the method to their commercial environment and use those parts of PRINCE that work for them. This is acceptable as the puritanical days of sticking rigidly to a method are seen now as undesirable and unnecessary.

Originally developed for IS and IT projects to reduce cost and time overruns; the second revision was made more generic an applicable to any project type.

In 2002 and 2005 PRINCE2 was updated in consultation with the international user community.

2009 PRINCE2 Major Revision

A major revision has seen the method made simpler and more easily customisable, a common request from users. The updated version has seven basic principles (not in the previous version) that contribute to project success:

  • Business Case
  • Organisation
  • Plans
  • Risk
  • Progress
  • Quality
  • Issues & Changes

Overall the updated method aims to give project managers a better set of tools to deliver projects on time, within budget and to the right quality.

Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2010-2012 Home of Project Manager. All rights reserved.
Focus on project management. Powered by MyPmHome Team.